Appleton Paranormal Investigations

Private Residence  -  Hortonville, WI

January 10, 2009

January 23, 2009
 

Conclusion: 
 
 

VISUAL EVIDENCE:

A.P.I. was unable to gather any visual evidence other than video recordings of other evidentiary tools in operation such as EMF detectors fluctuating or dowsing rod movement during communication sessions.  Only a couple of photographs showed anything, and those were unsubstantiated orb activity which, due to a lack of other corroborating evidence, could be explained as dust or moisture in the air. 
 

AUDIO EVIDENCE:

A.P.I. captured various audio experiences during the investigation, but these were seemingly normal occurrences given the age of the structure and other individuals inside the structure.  Throughout the evening, various knocks and creaks were captured, and while some were unexplained, there was nothing to indicate any paranormal sources of these noises.

  

TECHNICAL EVIDENCE:

EMF readings throughout the building were relatively steady and unremarkable.  High readings were noted
in the living room of the home, and were emanating from the electrical heating baseboards.

Temperature readings throughout the evening were relatively steady.  A couple of minor fluctuations were noted such as a ‘cold feeling’ or a small ‘cold spot’, but there was nothing major to report from this evidence. 
 

 

PERSONAL EXPERIENCES: 
 

There were no notable personal experiences besides hearing the previously mentioned creaks, or knocks.  At one point,
a bedroom door appeared to close on its own, however, we were able to recreate the phenomenon and believe
it occurred due to natural configuration of the doorway.

At one other point, an unexplained light was observed in the upstairs hallway.  We were unable to recreate
the phenomenon exactly, but given outside traffic in the area, it is possible that
the light was the result of outside motor vehicles driving on area roads.

Team members agreed that there was no overall ‘feeling’ by anyone of any presence during our investigation.  Team members felt comfortable in the building and did not have any physical experiences which could be construed as personal evidence of paranormal activity.
 

ANALYSIS: 
 

Appleton Paranormal Investigations was unable to collect any evidence of paranormal activity during this investigation.  While the residents reported unexplained experiences, no such happenings occurred during our visits.

Two separate investigations were conducted at the location due to the fact that on January 10, 2009,
the residents remained in the location and as a result, we were unable to adequately
collect audio evidence due to the noise in the home.

When API reported this to the residents, they graciously allowed us to return on January 23, 2009
and conduct another investigation, this time having complete control of the
location, and without any disturbances.